You can’t be a sports fan in the 2010s and not be intimately familiar with the phrase “small sample size.” One play, one game does not make a career. If it did, Matt Flynn, Kevin Ogletree, and Beanie Wells might be all-time greats.
We know that we have to look beyond a single data point to reach a conclusion. But I’m of the opinion that sometimes, even citing the “small sample size” dogma, we underestimate just what is a small sample size. Tyrell Williams, for example, finished 2016 tied for 11th in standard fantasy scoring at the WR position. But over the last two years combined, his total of 244 points ranks only tied for 25th — still respectable, still buoyed by that one big year, but more a product of the fact that he has played all 32 games over the two years than any great testament to his performance.
Inherently, we can suss out some of the outliers. That’s why Williams’ ADP heading into 2018 is in the mid-70s among receivers and not in the flex-with-upside range. But something we can get fooled. So today, I’m looking at the two-year leaders in a handful of categories. For things like raw totals, players get rewarded for health by doing this, but in a lot of ways health is a skill as well.
Today, I’ll look at fantasy points. Thursday, I’ll come back with the same approach, but for some of our PFF Signature Stats.
Fantasy points
Quarterbacks
Quarterback fantasy point totals | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined | ||||
1 | Aaron Rodgers | 391 | Russell Wilson | 361 | Russell Wilson | 635 |
2 | Drew Brees | 355 | Cam Newton | 315 | Drew Brees | 626 |
3 | Matt Ryan | 354 | Tom Brady | 306 | Kirk Cousins | 619 |
4 | Andrew Luck | 327 | Alex Smith | 302 | Matt Ryan | 600 |
5 | Kirk Cousins | 318 | Kirk Cousins | 301 | Matthew Stafford | 586 |
It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Wilson sits atop the quarterback list across both years, but with injuries, Brady’s suspension, and inconsistency at the position, the last two years have been topsy-turvy at quarterback. Takeaways:
- Brees was barely a QB1 in 2017, but is still second across the two years, which is a testament to both the high floor of fantasy quarterbacks and his overall consistency.
- Stafford is the epitome of a quarterback who will never finish atop the position but is always a starter — since taking the starting job in Detroit full-time in 2011, he’s never finished better than fifth but has been top-10 every year but one. He’s currently going outside the top-10 at the position in ADP, which is a mixed bag — some of the quarterbacks going around him have a better shot at finishing No. 1, but almost nobody in that range has a better shot at finishing as a QB1. If you wait on QB in your draft, you can’t do much better.
- Like Stafford, Cousins has been consistent as a starter, if lacking a truly elite ceiling. It’s been over a shorter stretch. In Cousins’ favor heading into 2018, he has the best stable of weapons he’s ever had now that he’s with Minnesota, throwing to Adam Thielen, Stefon Diggs, and Kyle Rudolph. Still, the fact that he’s going so far ahead of Stafford in ADP right now (Cousins seventh, Stafford 13th) feels like a mistake on some end.
Running backs
Running back PPR point totals | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined | ||||
1 | David Johnson | 407 | Todd Gurley | 382 | Le'Veon Bell | 656 |
2 | Ezekiel Elliott | 322 | Le'Veon Bell | 343 | Todd Gurley | 580 |
3 | Le'Veon Bell | 313 | Alvin Kamara | 313 | LeSean McCoy | 556 |
4 | LeSean McCoy | 293 | Kareem Hunt | 296 | Melvin Gordon | 540 |
5 | DeMarco Murray | 288 | Melvin Gordon | 287 | Ezekiel Elliott | 524 |
As our Curtis Patrick noted a week ago, Bell is the only running back in the last five years to repeat as a top-five PPR back. As such, it shouldn’t be a surprise that he sits atop the position over 2016 and 2017 combined. Takeaways:
- Rookies made up two of the top five and four of the top 12 PPR backs last year and two of the top 12 in 2016, making big combined performances naturally difficult — Elliott doubled down in 2017 sandwiched around a suspension, while Jordan Howard’s receiving deficiencies kept him from huge PPR value. We’ll see if Kamara, Hunt, Christian McCaffrey, or Leonard Fournette can make the two-year list after 2018.
- The career arcs for Gordon and Gurley has been fascinating — Gurley was great in 2015, while Gordon struggled. Gordon surged in 2016, but Gurley’s numbers waned. In 2017, both finished as top-five backs. With both now calling Los Angeles their home city, and both playing for likely contenders, their ADPs (Gurley near the top of the entire draft, Gordon a low-end RB1) make sense.
- McCoy’s fantasy points stayed strong in 2017 (his 263 points ranked seventh at the position) but his yards per carry fell from 5.4 to 4.0, and his yards after contact per carry fell from 2.4 to 2.1. The fantasy community has noticed, with McCoy’s ADP falling to the back end of the RB1s. There isn’t much competition for carries in Buffalo, but McCoy’s days as an elite fantasy back are waning.
Wide receivers
Wide receiver PPR point totals | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined | ||||
1 | Antonio Brown | 307 | DeAndre Hopkins | 311 | Antonio Brown | 612 |
2 | Jordy Nelson | 306 | Antonio Brown | 305 | Michael Thomas | 517 |
3 | Mike Evans | 300 | Keenan Allen | 277 | Julio Jones | 512 |
4 | Odell Beckham Jr. | 297 | Jarvis Landry | 261 | DeAndre Hopkins | 508 |
5 | T.Y. Hilton | 272 | Larry Fitzgerald | 260 | Larry Fitzgerald | 504 |
Brown was the No. 1 receiver in 2016 by one point. He was No. 2 in 2017 by six. Over the two years combined, though, he’s been the No. 1 receiver by 95 points. That’s … big. Takeaways:
- Neither Thomas nor Jones has been top-five in either of the last two years, but they’ve been WR6 and WR7 both years (Jones sixth, Thomas seventh in 2016; Thomas sixth, Jones seventh in 2017). Like Stafford at quarterback, two-year totals are good at finding the highest-floor options.
- Let’s look at the ages of the receivers in the two-year top-five. One of them is doing things players aren’t supposed to do at that age:
- Brown: 29
- Thomas: 25
- Jones: 29
- Hopkins: 26
- Fitzgerald: 34
Tight ends
Tight end PPR point totals | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined | ||||
1 | Travis Kelce | 221 | Travis Kelce | 236 | Travis Kelce | 457 |
2 | Kyle Rudolph | 209 | Rob Gronkowski | 224 | Zach Ertz | 387 |
3 | Greg Olsen | 205 | Zach Ertz | 203 | Kyle Rudolph | 367 |
4 | Jimmy Graham | 191 | Delanie Walker | 177 | Delanie Walker | 364 |
5 | Delanie Walker | 187 | Evan Engram | 174 | Jimmy Graham | 360 |
Obviously, Gronkowski’s injury in 2016 hurts him here. Takeaways:
- Unlike receiver and quarterback, every two-year top-five tight end has finished in the top five in at least one of the last two years, including Kelce and Walker finishing in the top five both seasons. More than a testament to the top end of the position, it’s really an indictment of the lower-tier tight ends — the dropoff around the back end of the TE1s the last two years has been significant. What that ends up meaning is the top options at tight end are that much more valuable.
Fantasy points per game
Quarterbacks
Quarterback fantasy points per game | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined* | ||||
1 | Aaron Rodgers | 24.4 | Deshaun Watson | 25.0 | Aaron Rodgers | 23.0 |
2 | Drew Brees | 22.2 | Russell Wilson | 22.6 | Tom Brady | 20.2 |
3 | Matt Ryan | 22.1 | Carson Wentz | 22.1 | Russell Wilson | 19.8 |
4 | Andrew Luck | 21.8 | Alex Smith | 20.1 | Drew Brees | 19.6 |
5 | Tom Brady | 21.6 | Aaron Rodgers | 19.7 | Kirk Cousins | 19.3 |
(*min. 1 game played in each season)
With the exception of Cam Newton’s absence, I sort of love how well the chart of points per game over the last two years mesh with my personal rankings. It makes me think there’s something to this.
Running backs
Running back PPR points per game | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined* | ||||
1 | Le'Veon Bell | 26.1 | Todd Gurley | 25.5 | David Johnson | 24.7 |
2 | David Johnson | 25.4 | Le'Veon Bell | 22.9 | Le'Veon Bell | 22.6 |
3 | Ezekiel Elliott | 21.5 | Ezekiel Elliott | 20.2 | Ezekiel Elliott | 21.0 |
4 | LeSean McCoy | 19.5 | Alvin Kamara | 19.6 | Todd Gurley | 18.7 |
5 | Melvin Gordon | 19.5 | Kareem Hunt | 18.5 | Melvin Gordon | 18.6 |
(*min. 1 game played in each season)
The top 10 of our staff PPR running back rankings for 2018 include the five names above, plus five players who weren’t eligible for this (2017 rookies and Saquon Barkley). Yeah, I’m enjoying this method.
Wide receivers
Wide receiver PPR points per game | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined* | ||||
1 | Antonio Brown | 20.5 | Antonio Brown | 21.8 | Antonio Brown | 21.1 |
2 | Jordy Nelson | 19.1 | DeAndre Hopkins | 20.7 | Odell Beckham Jr. | 18.6 |
3 | Mike Evans | 18.8 | Odell Beckham Jr. | 18.5 | Julio Jones | 17.1 |
4 | A.J. Green | 18.6 | Keenan Allen | 17.3 | Keenan Allen | 17.0 |
5 | Julio Jones | 18.6 | Jarvis Landry | 16.3 | Michael Thomas | 16.7 |
(*min. 1 game played in each season)
DeAndre Hopkins’ quarterback-induced miserable 2016 is a big drag on his overall numbers, but otherwise, this is five of the top six names in our staff rankings
Tight ends
Tight end PPR points per game | ||||||
2016 | 2017 | Combined* | ||||
1 | Jordan Reed | 14.2 | Rob Gronkowski | 17.2 | Rob Gronkowski | 15.3 |
2 | Travis Kelce | 13.8 | Travis Kelce | 15.7 | Travis Kelce | 14.7 |
3 | Zach Ertz | 13.1 | Zach Ertz | 14.5 | Zach Ertz | 13.8 |
4 | Kyle Rudolph | 13.1 | Evan Engram | 11.6 | Jordan Reed | 12.7 |
5 | Greg Olsen | 12.8 | Jack Doyle | 11.4 | Delanie Walker | 11.7 |
(*min. 1 game played in each season)
By almost any measure, Gronkowski, Kelce, and Ertz are (and should be) entering 2018 as the top three tight ends, and almost certainly in that order. If you had some way to guarantee Reed’s health, he’d be right there as well. And Walker is sixth in our consensus rankings, behind 2017 rookie Engram and bounceback candidate Olsen.
The lesson here? Fantasy point totals, or point-per-game averages, from the most recent season have their value. But the sample size is still too small. Alex Smith likely won’t be a top-five quarterback in 2018, but he was in 2017. But two years combined? That method appears to match up with our overall expectations alarmingly well. One game is a small sample. So are two games. And so are 16.