The case for waiting on a fantasy quarterback

(“Today's Crazy Fantasy Stat” is an occasional offseason offering from PFF that highlights something that catches our eye and aids in our preparation for the 2017 fantasy season.)

Barring even more changes aimed at making things easier for offensive players, it feels like we’ve hit a reasonable ceiling on individual fantasy football numbers. For example, even as offensive levels league-wide have risen, the fantasy leader at each position in the last decade came in 2013 or earlier, and the overall trends have held reasonably steady.

In other words, the highest fantasy scores in the last decade for each position are:

Quarterback: Peyton Manning, 2013, 422 fantasy points
Running back (standard): Chris Johnson, 2009, 348 fantasy points
Wide receiver (standard): Randy Moss, 2007, 286 fantasy points
Tight end (standard): Rob Gronkowski, 2013, 218 fantasy points

You aren’t likely to draft a 2017 quarterback who will get you 450 points, or a running back who will get you 350, or … you get the idea. The ceiling is established.

(Subscribe to all our fantasy content, or get everything PFF offers with an All-Access subscription.)

Long story short, even as offensive levels have risen (passing yards per game are up about 50 yards, while rushing yards are down by a negligible amount), the top guys at each position are doing about the same.

It stands to reason, then, that the increases in offense come further down the line. The No. 10 guy at each position must be scoring more, or the No. 20. Only … not really.

The No. 10 running back in 2007 scored 188 fantasy points; in 2016 it was 195. No. 20 was 152 in 2007, 155 in 2016. 30th, 40th, it stays about the same. (And, lest you think ’07 or ’16 were outliers in otherwise noticeable trends … well, they aren’t.) At receiver, the 10th-, 20th-, and 30th-place receivers were all comparable, as well. There’s a noticeable different at tight end (No. 20 in 2007 scored 53 fantasy points compared to 73 last year), but who is owning the No. 20 fantasy tight end with any regularity?

No, overall, there are only two areas where the increase in offense is very visible. The first is at the dregs of the position at wide receiver — the No. 40 receiver has gotten significantly better, going from 97 fantasy points in 2007 to 112 in 2016.

The chart below shows the number of wide receivers who have reached each 25-fantasy-point level in a season. Note that through the 125-point mark, most everything holds steady, year-to-year, before things spike lower down.

Number of wide receivers at each threshold of fantasy points
	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
275	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
250	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
225	2	0	0	0	1	1	2	4	3	0
200	5	2	2	2	4	5	6	6	6	3
175	9	6	9	6	8	10	11	12	9	6
150	15	13	16	16	16	18	17	17	18	10
125	26	25	25	25	24	27	26	28	29	29
100	38	38	37	42	43	43	41	47	44	50
75	64	52	63	62	60	62	61	61	59	64
50	78	80	83	83	86	83	91	89	87	91
25	109	107	111	116	120	119	116	116	120	123

The second area where you can see the impact of increased scoring is, logically, at quarterback. Yes, the top of the heap at QB still has a ceiling. The No. 1 quarterback scored 398 fantasy points in 2007, 397 in 2011, 397 in 2015, and 385 last year. But the No. 10 QB has risen by 51 points in a decade. Even more dramatically, the No. 20 has skyrocketed (130 in 2007, 240 in 2016).

Here’s the quarterback version of that wide receiver chart above, the number of guys who have crossed each 50-point threshold in the last 10 years. Note the numbers jump at every level, save the very top and the very bottom.

Number of quarterbacks at each threshold of fantasy points
	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
350	1	0	0	0	4	1	2	2	1	1
300	1	1	2	2	5	7	2	6	7	5
250	7	7	9	8	10	13	15	17	17	18
200	13	14	18	19	18	22	20	20	24	25
150	19	24	21	26	24	27	26	26	26	28
100	27	30	26	29	32	31	37	31	32	30
50	42	36	36	41	40	36	42	42	37	39

This is why, despite the highest ceiling of any position, you don’t take Aaron Rodgers (or Cam Newton, or Top QB of the Year) first overall. But whereas a decade ago, it made some sense to pounce on the third, fourth quarterback, just to make sure you got strong production, even that is a dodgy strategy now.

Sharps have been saying over the last few years to either be the first player in your fantasy league to draft a quarterback, or the last. And while that might be on the extreme side in some cases, it has merit. The top quarterbacks aren’t doing any more than they have been for a long time. But the lower tiers? They’re rising up to join them.